Google's backend-in-a-box — auth, database, storage and push in an afternoon, priced by usage instead of headcount.
Firebase bundles the backend most apps need — authentication, a realtime database (Firestore), file storage, push notifications, analytics, crash reporting — behind client SDKs that sync state automatically, even offline. You write almost no server code; you configure services and ship. It's the fastest path from idea to a working app on someone's phone.
Firebase powers our MVPs and the long tail of app features that don't deserve custom infrastructure: auth flows, push, crash reporting. We're equally clear about its edges — when queries get relational or unit costs matter at scale, we graduate the hot paths to Postgres and keep Firebase for what it's best at.
Firebase against the open-source BaaS challenger and the build-it-yourself default — speed now versus control later.
| Dimension | Firebase | Supabase | Custom (Node + Postgres) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database model | Firestore — NoSQL documents, realtime sync | Postgres — real SQL, realtime on top | Postgres — full control |
| Time to first launch | Fastest — days | Fast | Weeks — you build the plumbing |
| Offline sync | Best-in-class, built into SDKs | Basic | You build it |
| Complex queries | Weak — denormalise or suffer | Full SQL | Full SQL |
| Lock-in | High — proprietary APIs | Low — it's Postgres underneath | None |
| Cost at scale | Usage-priced; can spike with success | Predictable tiers | Infrastructure cost only |
Firebase is the right first backend for most consumer apps — and the wrong last one for some. We ship on it without apology and design the exits in advance, so success never turns into a hostage negotiation.
Tell us what you're building — we'll tell you honestly whether Firebase is the right tool for it.